Series: The Maze Runner Trilogy #1Publisher: Delacorte PressSource: Owned
When Thomas wakes up in the lift, the only thing he can remember is his first name. His memory is blank. But he’s not alone. When the lift’s doors open, Thomas finds himself surrounded by kids who welcome him to the Glade—a large, open expanse enclosed by stone walls.
Just like Thomas, the Gladers don’t know why or how they got to the Glade. All they know is that every morning the stone doors to the maze that surrounds them, open. Every night they are closed tight. And that every 30 days a new boy is delivered in the lift.
Thomas was expected. Only the next day, a girl is sent up—the first girl to ever arrive in the Glade. And more surprising yet is the message she delivers.
Thomas might be more important than he could ever guess. If only he could unlock the dark secrets that are buried within his mind.
For a review of the second book of the series, The Scorch Trials, check out Alvie's review here.
Well. Hi again. Remember me, Hayley? The one that left for a month and is now going to magically reappear like a magical unicorn? Well. Yeah. So hi. ON WITH THE REVIEW.
The Maze Runner has been on my 'to-read' list (which, as you know if you see me on Goodreads only goes up in numbers and never back down again) for a long time- it was first recommended to me when I read the Hunger Games, and since then it's been popping up on all of my recommended and to-read lists, though I fully blame that on the ridiculous amounts of dystopian novels I read being the cause. So I had high expectations for this novel. I expected it to knock me off my feet.
And it did.... well, kind of.
See, The Maze Runner was technically a good book. It had a really nice main character, the secondary characters were fleshed out and everyone was generally quite interesting. The idea was fantastic. It was a perfect dystopian setting, and the plot and action and everything should have been awesome. So why didn't it give me ALL THE FEELINGS? Why didn't I get the little excited shivers I usually get when reading about dysto worlds and how they worked
After a fairly small amount of thinking, I had the answer. *que dramatic horns*
There was very little world building. Yes, it existed, on a minimal amount about the small area they were in, but not even the way they behaved indicated they were in a dystopian area. There was close to no information gained about the world throughout the entire novel, and it was only at the end where you got a tiny glimpse of what the world was like, though I have to say by then I wasn't really paying attention. World building is crucial, and I mean crucial to dystopian novels, and that was what James Dashner lacked.
Another thing I have to nitpick on was the fact that I felt no connection to the other main character- the girl/love interest/plot point/soul mate/magical unicorn. She's supposedly very important, but all she did throughout the novel was be in coma and communicate telepathically. There was just no information, and that frustrated me immensely throughout the entire novel.
Overall, The Maze Runner was an action packed book full of mystery but I felt as if the world building was lacking and I never connected with some of the main characters. I do wish I loved it, but I don't. 3 stars... or more circles, now that I think about it.


I really had a hard time with this one. I loved the idea of it all but it just didn't work for me. I agree about the world building, it lacked. But I disagree about the characters. I never felt connected to any of them. :( By the end, I found myself not really caring what happened to any of them. But, I am a very character driven reader ~ therefore picky in that area.
ReplyDeleteMy nephew on the other hand loves the series and he isn't even a big reader, so that says something!
I agree- I had a hard time with this as well. Sorry about the characters though I will say I agree to a point- most of them were very similar. I don't think being picky about characters is a bad idea though, as they are crucial!
DeleteI guess it's just a matter of opinion though- I have heard that many people love it though, so maybe it's just me.
darn...this was on my list. I love world-building very bummed this one didn't deliver. I will wait for reviews of book two..since you liked the characters/concept.
ReplyDeleteGreat review.
FYI..synopsis isn't showing, just white strips. If you copy and paste synopsis, you can go to html side and just delete everywhere it says background:white; color #XXXXXX.
Have a great weekend!
Thanks for the tip off! I had no clue before, and hopefully it's been fixed now.
DeleteI've heard book 2 wasn't as good as the first one, which is a bummer. Maybe you'll still like it though, so you should still give it a try... maybe borrow it instead? I was really hoping that the world building will deliver (I love getting down to the political corruptness things), so maybe that's just me.
Have a great weekend too!
Well, I'm glad you liked it, but sorry it fell flat. :( I've heard a lot about this one, but never read it myself. The premise sounds great, but in novels like this, world-building is crucial, and a lack of it can really bring the whole thing down.
ReplyDeleteI KNOW. I desperately wanted to love it because it was such an awesome idea, but the world building (or the lack of it) was something that COULD NOT BE EXCUSED.
DeleteYikes. I've only heard good things about this one, but how can you really appreciate a novel without solid world building? And I'm a big feelings person too:( I still might try this one and see how my thoughts compare, but I'm sorry you didn't like it!
ReplyDeleteBook 2 being worse than the first doesn't give me much hope:( I was really disappointed with Matched and Crossed (by Ally Condie) in that way, except I thought Matched was awesome and Crossed really fell short.
-Jenna