Warning: The following post contains massive Jane Eyre and Twilight spoilers. Please feel free to discuss, but I am not an expert on this topic (duh) and arguments in the comments don't do anyone any good. I'm also not hating on Stephanie Meyer--I admire her success. Peace.
Jane Eyre: A young girl meets a typical Byronic hero, falls in love with said hero, but due to tragic circumstances, is separated from him and meets a second love interest. Eventually, however, since she is obviously destined to be with Mr Rochester (
You belong with me!), they are reunited and get married at last.
YA: A young girl meets a typical Byronic hero (or close enough anyway), falls in
love lust with said hero, but due to tragic circumstances, is separated from him and (normally) meets a second love interest. Eventually, however, since she is obviously destined to be with Love Interest #1, they are reunited and stay together for the rest of the book. Repeat x2 for a trilogy. Marriage will sometimes but not usually follow.
Let's face it--despite being a fascinating work of literature, Jane Eyre has some of my modern-day YA pet peeves: a love triangle and a girl who almost immediately clicks with a guy at first sight and gets pretty possessive of him. There's also the undertone of
True Love! running throughout the novel, and despite hardships and thoroughly unfortunate circumstances that have separated Jane and Rochester, because they are destined to be together, they marry in the end. I'm particularly wary of the part where Rochester calls for help at the end of the book and Jane
magically hears his summons, which is how she finds him again.
Bronte, I think, is a bit of a hopeless romantic, mostly because despite the novel starting with a rather unfortunate course of events so far--let's face it, Jane's an orphan, her uncle dies, leaving her with an aunt who doesn't care for her, and she's sent to an institution where her only friend dies of tuberculosis--Jane finds ultimate happiness in her love for Rochester. Sure, she returned on equal terms to the love of her life, but what matters is that in the end, she did. Her way of finding happiness was to marry the man she loved.
And now, let's take a look at Twilight, which bears remarkable similarities to Jane Eyre yet warps it and turns it into an utterly disgusting pile of slush. Bella falls in love with
Edward Cullen (remember our dearest
Edward Rochester?), who is a brooding, dark
vampire. They're separated at various points in the novel when Edward decides that he is too dangerous for Bella and takes off for Italy or whatever ridiculous plot twist was put in to fill up the gap between Books 1 and 4, and according to what I remember, Bella almost committed suicide because apparently she heard Edward-Mr-Overprotective-and-Possessive's voice ringing in her head every time she did something stupid.
Which stumped me, because she was always doing something stupid.
Anyway, the fundamental difference in these two novels is that 1. Jane returned on equal terms to Rochester, and she was the one who went back to him (I could ramble on about why I didn't like that ending, but I don't think I will), 2. Jane was a strong-willed woman who showed that she could cope, even without a male, and 3. Jane had a fiery sense of passion and rejected St John multiple times when she thought that what he was doing wasn't fair and just.
I'm going to wrap this up quickly because I need to go to bed, but what I'm trying to get at here is that even after so many years since Bronte first published Jane Eyre in the 19th century, have we gone backwards with our female protagonists? When we compare Jane and Bella, there is a very obvious difference in that Jane is a strong-willed, self-sufficient woman who has endured many hardships and is willing to stand up for herself, while when I look at Bella, I see a girl who is infatuated by a hundred and something year-old vampire, simply because he's hot.
You would think that after so many decades of feminists and so much fighting for the rights of women (and it goes on!), we'd have stronger female protagonists. You'd think that we'd have made progress from the days of Jane Eyre. But clearly not, and it's kind of shameful that in YA, feminism seems to be going backwards.
Not all females are damsels in distress, and I don't like girls being portrayed that way either, particularly not in sci-fi or fantasy, where these cliches appear to be the most prevalent.
Because let's face it: even though Jane is a 19th-century Victorian orphan, she's still way more badass and fun to read about than Bella Swan is.
And on that note, goodnight.